yupfarming

A Global Corporate Youth Brigade: Using Social Networks for Evil

2011-08-20T12:43:00.003-04:00

by Rufus Johnson

Young people today would never respond to an invitation to join a Nazi Youth brigade. But they have responded to social networks to be connected to their friends and are responding in the millions to fun projects to save the world. But have they looked closely at who is behind social networking and to what uses it is being put already?

Social networks are using knowledge of everyone's friends, what everyone is doing, and now starting to use social networks for harm.

A "vast green army" is being organized by Cornell and IBM. Cornell is tightly bound to Monsanto, so its projects to get young people to locate all plant and animal species in the world and GPS map them, and even in backyards, is worrisome, to say the least since it can be used for anti-ecological corporate purposes. It could help Monsanto to locate, patent and control nature, even more than they already do - and all for free, all under the name of "ecological fun" or saving the planet, by using naive, caring young people to do the investigative work for them. Monsanto is presently defoliating the Brazilian rainforest and has been doing that in Colombia for years, and is pushing laws to make it a felony to whistleblow on agribusiness (itself).

As for IBM, they were the experts used by the Third Reich to locate Jews and their assets and to coordinate trains to the concentration camps. The huge number of deaths during the Holocaust were only possible through IBM's collection of data. Now they are roping in kids to collect data for them and using the combined power of millions of kids' computers to crunch it. They are storing information not just on kids report but on those reporting it. Through fun social networking projects, IBM is setting up global surveillance.

The Rockefellers (connected to both Monsanto and IBM) had 1/2 interest in the Holocaust. Their connection to the Bushes is shot through with control over and alteration of nature for profit. Their history and current direction are not anything young environmentalists would want to support. But since their UN plan is billed as Eco and Green and Sustainable, many young people could be misled, and not notice that the UN's real interest in Sustainable is more than suspect. It is currently letting place after place be plundered and indigenous people be forced off their land, without a word to stop them. The UN's Global Compact is directly involved with that plunder and the situation has become so serious that Global Compact Critics was formed, "an informal network of organizations and people with concerns about ... partnerships between the United Nations and companies, and corporate accountability.

Right now, farmers, gardeners, environmentalists, indigenous people, around the world are working to save plants and animals and insects and to protect diversity, many actually hiding organic seeds or knowledge of where unique plants may be. As farmers producing organic food or milk or meat are being attacked in the US by the FDA and its food safety Czar, and even gardens are threatened, people here are even going underground to obtain fresh food, creating secret buying clubs and meeting in parking lots at night to sell farm food.

Will social networks be told how good it would be for "sustainable" local food systems to map how many gardens there are in the US, how many urban chickens, how many milking goats, how many farmers markets (not matter how small or off the grid) and where they all are? Agribusiness has been slaughtering animals in vast numbers for decades and pushing into extinction rare animal breeds. It was only through Haitians hiding their special breed of Creole pig that they managed to protect enough breeding stock to try to bring back the breed. In the UK, tens of millions of farm animals were slaughtered to "stamp out" FMD (foot and mouth disease), a non-threatening disease, causing a number of breeds to go extinct. The two outbreaks were caused by lab leaks (the USDA is moving a germ lab to the middle of cattle country over the strenuous objections of cattlemen and scientists who predict a in 10 chance of a leak). In Korea, 2 million animals were destroyed after an FMD outbreak, hogs buried alive. Most animals (90% - 99%?) were not sick at all and would have gotten over FMD in a week or more. Were Korean farmers able to hide any of their animals from the 70,000 military brought in to kill them, in an undeclared corporate war on animals? Korea had been resisting imports of US cattle over fear of Mad Cow disease, but now having lost 1/5 or their own livestock (with threats that FMD might return), they are less position to be picky.

In Brazil, where JBS is the large meat producer in the world, rainforests are being mowed down (or defoliated by Monsanto) to grow cattle and Monsanto's GE-soy as cattle feed, all for export to places like Korea (where they suddenly lost their own livestock under UN/FAO rules of slaughter - not quarantine). Yet, there are many states in Brazil with active FMD, but there is no UN call to slaughter those cattle. They are owned by the multinational cattle ranchers threatening the survival of uncontacted tribes, and are part of the UN Global Compact.

This is not about health but about corporate globalization of food and efforts to make sure none is in the hands of farmers or local people.

In the EU, the pharmaceutical industry under "food safety" have gotten all herbal remedies banned as unapproved drugs. From that position, they may ban gardeners from growing herbs, which they are calling "green pharmaceuticals." This is not far-fetched since in Australia there is a plan to ban 1000's of common garden plants.

Yet social networks are already being used as corporate tipsters. Young people, excited to help "save" the earth are being enlisted as the eyes on everything, recorded via their cell phone's photos with global coordinates included (and GPS tracking as well). If asked, social networks would jump to locate every animal, every beehive, every unique plant, every farm, every hidden garden, not realizing they would be cutting their own and the earth's throat. Because they would be turning in data on every living thing to corporations that are either genetically engineering them to patent them or outright destroying them.

Instead, they should be protecting the earth and everyone's (even animals') lives by keeping secret where plants, animals, insects, and even humans, are.

The naivete of caring young people is an outcome of their good hearts because they see good everywhere. It is not easy to see what is going on because corporations have disguised what they are doing. But true environmental efforts are being betrayed as corporation take them over. The daughter of the founder of Environmental Defense saw that betrayal and stormed the offices of ED with other real environmentalists in protest of ED supporting corporate predation through carbon trading.

When words like "sustainable" and "eco" and ''green" become PR for corporations, young people must see through to reality so they can work with those like themselves who legitimately care. If a group has a huge presence, such as ads on Hulu, or Care.org (using greeting cards as a means to collect more names), they have big money coming from somewhere.

Corporately funded organizations rouse feelings in young people to do something positive, but usually it is for weak action or in the wrong direction, at a critical political moment. How many groups like CREDO or Food and Water Watch have sent out messages for signatures for petitions against Monsanto's rBGH? It is a way to say "We are with you, we are the good guys." But did they send messages to alert people that the food safety bill would put Monsanto in charge of all food? No.

Oxfam and other NGOs have nice names but their connections are not so nice. Wanting to help other countries has even morphed into a new geopolitical military strategy to override sovereign countries and ignore international law in order to "protect" people. But this is being done with the UN demanding no votes before sovereign countries are invaded based on corporate media driven "humanitarian" necessity. It is a new colonialism. Previous financial powers used saving souls from paganism as the cover. But whatever it is called, it was and still is, about plunder.

If young people in social networks want to help the earth, it's imperative they not become a corporate youth movement, share data on nature and people with corporate interests. They must look behind university programs which are often funded by such interests and distrust any large "fun" new project that involves collecting data. If they want to help, they begin watching the corporations and NGOs and exposing violations against people and the earth. For it is evidence of corporate depredation that is needed. And it's clear the UN is not helping.

Oxfam is but one NGO receiving Rockefeller funding. Below is a list of organizations funded by rhe Rockefeller Brothers Fund (RBF). Not one, despite their "caring" names, tried to stop the Food Modernization and Safety Act though it was obvious all food and farms in the US would be under the control of Monsanto and that land, water, plants, animals, and people were all threatened. Perhaps the following organizations did not know what was at stake (though millions of people did) , perhaps they were only persuaded to take another course ....

the Tides Foundation; the Tides Center; SeaWeb; Greenpeace; the Environmental Media Services; the National Environmental Trust; Human Rights Watch; the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy; Friends of the Earth; the David Suzuki Foundation; the Natural Resources Defense Council; theEnvironmental Defense Fund; the Ocean Conservancy; the H. John Heinz Center for Science, Economics and the Environment; Alliance for Justice; the Puerto Rican Legal Defense and Education Fund; the Council on Foundations; the American Oceans Campaign; the Sierra Club; the Rainforest Action Network; the World Resources Institute; the Earth Island Institute; the Environmental Working Group; the World Wildlife Fund; the Urban Institute; the Izaak Walton League of America; the Open Space Institute; the Conservation Law Foundation; the U.S. Public Interest Research Group Education Fund; the Wilderness Society; the Worldwatch Institute; the Union of Concerned Scientists; Ozone Action; the Pacific Rivers Council; the Rainforest Alliance; the National Wildlife Federation; Clean Water Action; Action Against Crime and Violence Education Fund; the Pesticide Action Network; the Community Action Project; the Consultative Group on Biological Diversity; the International Forum on Globalization; Redefining Progress; Environmental Advocates; Public Citizen; Conservation International; the Earth Day Network; Physicians for Social Responsibility; Forest Ethics; the Biodiversity Action Network; Consumers Union; the Center for Health, Environment and Justice; the Public Media Center; the Environmental Research Foundation; the Environmental Justice Alliance; the League of Conservation Voters; Oxfam America; the Waterkeeper Alliance; the Resource Renewal Institute; the Foundation on Economic Trends; the Environmental Grantmakers Association; the Center for Science in the Public Interest; the Center for a New American Dream; Green Seal; the Northwest Coalition for Alternatives to Pesticides; the New America Foundation; Friends of the Constitution; the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN); the American Conservation Association; the American Council for Renewable Energy; the Aspen Institute; the Brookings Institution; the National Black Child Development Institute; the Center for Clean Air Policy; the Center for Economic and Policy Research; the Center for Media and Public Affairs; the Center for Policy Alternatives; Earth Share; EarthRights International; the Wildlife Conservation Society; the Brennan Center for Justice; the World Social Forum; the Women's Project and Production; Ecologists Linked for Organizing Grassroots Initiatives and Action; Environmental Aboriginal Guardianship Through Law and Education; the Forest Trends Association; the Pacific Institute for Studies in Development, Environment and Security; Global Justice, Inc.; the Institute for Policy Studies; the Institute for Sustainable Communities; the Gay Men's Health Crisis; Planned Parenthood; the Sentencing Project; the Lawyer's Committee for Human Rights; Public Broadcasting Service; the International Peace Academy; the Jewish Fund for Justice; the Meridian Institute; the National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy; Amnesty International; National Public Radio; the Nature Conservancy; the Organizing Support Center; the New York University Institute for Education and Social Policy; the Wild Salmon Center; the Pacific Environment and Resources Center; the Parks Council; the Pinchot Institute for Conservation; the Ploughshares Fund; Project Underground; theRockefeller Family Fund; TechRocks; the Third World Network; and the United Nations Foundation.

Playing the HAARP Nicely

2011-08-20T11:53:00.003-04:00

by Randy Wheeler

"Others are engaging even in an eco-type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of (Scalar) electromagnetic waves, so there are plenty of ingenious minds out there that are at work finding ways in which they can wreak terror upon other nations. It's real, and that's the reason why we have to intensify our efforts, and that's why this is so important."

William Cohen, U.S. Secretary of Defense, April 1997, Quoted from Department of Defense News Briefing., Sam Nunn

The system William Cohen is describing goes by the name, HAARP, High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program. This article is not about any military use of HAARP so those who eschew disturbing information can relax and continue reading.

Most people in the US have little idea that it exists or that it has the capacity to control the weather - from droughts and floods to tornados and hurricanes - and to set off earthquakes.

While some may shy away from believing this, immediately wondering about Fukuishima or Haiti or all the floods and serious droughts we're experiencing here, there is no denying the fact of this capability, now in the hands of the US military.

And weathermen have seen and are reporting strange weather data.

It's not as though the government hasn't done "science" things we have boggled at in the past - the Public Health service conducting the Tuskeegee experiment and then the CDC allowing it to continue, exposing citizens to nuclear testing, experimenting on our soldiers, using depleted uranium in Iraq, etc.

If one accepts that the US can cause droughts and floods, there is a wonderful upside. It means the US can fix a drought or stop flooding, and that is where we all come in.

Right now the southern portion of the country is experiencing a drought so severe there is talk of a new Dust Bowl.

On picture says it all.

This quite naturally poses a threat to the US food supply. While that may sound worrisome or even frightening to ordinary people, for those who profit by food shortages, droughts are a great blessing since there is no better marketing tool for food than starvation.

But one needn't quibble about whether the drought is gift to the insanely greedy from God, or a present to themselves from the greedy who play God. The point is that we have a severe drought and the government has the means to fix it.

That is incredibly good news. It offers a direction. Farming and food groups and others who like to eat, can now take action. They can begin requesting that the Obama Administration use the power of HAARP to make it rain over the drought regions of the southern US.

This offers a number of benefits, not the least of which is a chance for Obama to do something significant to help the country, and something quite immediate and visible.

And doing so would relieve the USDA of its callous refusal to pay out on drought insurance farmers and ranchers had bought, using the odd excuse that there is too much "greenness" for the insurance policies to kick in. One glance at the map makes the USDA's position embarrassingly false. If one of the worse droughts in US history isn't time to pay on drought insurance, when would be?

In coming together to make this request, all those farming groups and food groups and the country itself become aware that the US can alter the weather. While some may go further and ask if they have been doing so already, that is not necessary. Instead, asking Obama to use HAARP to make it rain becomes a mainstream request for federal assistance from a government with the ability to deliver it.

Issues of who caused the drought - God or man - and outstanding questions such as about Haiti which sits over a huge oil field are averted, and the issue remains at the level of a simple plea for help. It becomes a request that anyone along the political spectrum could easily "weather."

The request itself becomes a form of public education - we have means to protect from extremes of weather - and with Obama's assistance it also becomes a time of true government relief as rain is brought to drought-stricken areas.

The only difficulty arises if Obama does not help. It would be quite awkward for him because the government can't both warn about the great danger to the food supply from this drought and to our farmers' staying on the land, and then not do a relatively simple thing to save the food supply and the farmers. Without Obama responding, questions will arise as to whether the drought is desired, along with the loss of food, farmers and farmland.

This seeking of rain from the government has parallels with seeking rain from God, for in both cases, one worries that the rain may be withheld because of God or man's lack of benevolence toward the people. "Is God angry?" people have asked from time immemorial, when rain didn't come and felt they needed to be in a better place spiritually to invite its arrival.

Since no one need be a better place spiritually to expect the government to protect the population, things are simple: We have a drought, the US government has a mean to stop it.

This touches on global warming, as well, and in a positive way. Putting aside whether it might be being caused by HAARP or chemtrails or both, in knowing about HAARP's capabilities to bring rain or drought, this then means that droughts and flooding can be ended. Thus, the effects of global warming which are always being warned of in cataclysmic terms, can actually be avoided or greatly ameliorated. Many of the massive destructive effects predicted with global warming might be eased or lessened.

This should reassure the whole world.

Hopefully, global warming does not have value politically or financially such that it would make such common sense help unappealing.

Right now, though, farmers and ranchers are in trouble and all who care about the US being independent in food have a way to help them because there is a mans to address and end the drought. The country can join together in asking the government to provide rain and expect Obama to come to the aid of his country, its farmers and its food. It is a great moment for him, or it would be irredeemably embarrassing if he does nothing and lets things continue toward what we now know would be an unnecessary dust bowl.

Whether or not the drought is a deadly sin of commission, what is patent is that not to act to stop it would be a deadly a sin of omission.

What Is Wrong With the CDC?

2011-08-17T20:15:00.004-04:00

Bob Williams for Salem-News.com

"Bush politicized science agencies in the US, undermining science ...."

Courtesy: healthfreedoms.org

(LONDON) - There are US attorneys in Atlanta who are already looking into a CDC connection to the autism/vaccine researcher who has been indicted for fraud

The US has pandemic laws on the books and a new food safety law which both threaten the country with martial law (and threaten our normal animals with being - in Pat Roberts' word - "terminated") which would be based onCDC data and on the CDC declaring outbreaks.

How is it that all our lives (including our animals's lives - our primary food supply) and the country's future as a democracy have become tied to CDC information and the CDC status as an ultimate arbiter of "science" and danger - a CDC funded by the pharmaceutical corporations and involved with military?

If this country is to be safe, a closer look at the CDC is needed. This doesn't mean questioning the sincerity of the scientists working there but asking: "What is happening at the CDC at the policy level and what are its connections to profit-making vaccine manufacturers?"

CDC first began as an adjunct of the US Public Health Service, by helping the military and US colonial expansion.

The U.S. Public Health Service (USPHS) and Malaria (1914-1942)
During the U.S. military occupation of Cuba and the construction of the Panama Canal at the turn of the 20th century, U.S. officials made great strides in the control of malaria and yellow fever. ... USPHS established malaria control activities around military bases in the malarious regions of the southern United States to allow soldiers to train year round.

The drug used was chloroquine (Resochin) produced by the German pharmaceutical company Bayer... at the same time Bayer was running concentration camps across Europe during WWII).

To read more ....

Wisconsin's Honey and Vandana Shiva's Law for Food Fascism ...

2011-08-17T20:07:00.003-04:00

As tainted Asian honey floods the market and food safety "experts" again call for government action, an article from 2009 on Wisconsin's efforts to introduce Codex Alimentarius, beginning with honey, seems useful to consider..

By Meryl Williamson

What the Wisconsin Senate is attempting to do to honey is the beginning of a long planned noose-tightening for local farmers and food producers by multinational corporations. SB 419 offers a window into one of the ways they intend to achieve the death of local farming.

Vandana Shiva calls the laws that corporations are putting on the books that control food at a level never seen before in human history, “the Law for Food Fascism.” Her speech on the future of food is about more than dangers from biotechnology; it’s about the ability of all of us to have a choice of the foods that we eat, and for our farmers to be able to freely use their own seeds, and grow food in the manner that they choose.

In understanding Codex Alimentarius, it is not hard to imagine how similar laws, like SB 419, could be constructed to remove the right for anyone to grow food:

2009 − 2010 LEGISLATURE
2009 SENATE BILL 419
LRB−3834/1 CTS:cjs:rs

December 3, 2009 − Introduced by Senators VINEHOUT, LEHMAN, MILLER and SCHULTZ, cosponsored by Representatives GARTHWAITE, VRUWINK, BARCA, BALLWEG, BROOKS, CLARK, HILGENBERG, KERKMAN, KNODL, MOLEPSKE JR., A. OTT, PASCH, POPE−ROBERTS, RIPP, ROYS, SCHNEIDER, STEINBRINK, TAUCHEN, TURNER, A. WILLIAMS, YOUNG and ZIGMUNT. Referred to Committee on Agriculture and Higher Education.

AN ACT to create 100.187 of the statutes; relating to: requiring the Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection to establish standards for products sold as honey, prohibiting the labeling as Wisconsin certified honey of a product that has not been determined to meet the standards, prohibiting the labeling as honey of a product that does not meet the standards, and requiring the exercise of rule−making authority.

Analysis by the Legislative Reference Bureau

This bill requires the Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection (DATCP) to promulgate rules that establish standards for products sold as honey and standards for the testing by private laboratories of samples submitted by persons who wish to sell honey produced in this state as Wisconsin certified honey. The standards for honey must be consistent with the standard for honey under the Codex Alimentarius of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and the World Health Organization.

To read more ....

Farming: Why Obama's government is George Wallace, Monsanto is the KKK, and we are all black children now

2011-08-17T20:05:00.001-04:00

The US food supply is being taken over at this moment through regulations most people have never heard of or know about. Click here.

For years, environmentalists have been struggling to stop pesticides that are deadly to everything, and food safety people have been trying to stop GMOs that are threaten to human health and all of nature, and farming groups have been trying to stop regulations that make farming literally impossible. The arguments for organic farming and freedom to farm go beyond argument - it is patently obvious that is the only thing that makes any sense whatsoever.

So, why is industrial agriculture - which is depleting and contaminating our water supply, filling animals with drug after drug that make us sick, using such disgusting practices it has created Mad Cow and Bird Flu, wiping out fish stocks in the ocean with poisonous run-off into the Mississippi, causing suicides by the 10s of thousands in India and our own farmers deaths in huge numbers in the 80s here, destroying farming communities and the democratic base they provide this country, killing bees, and giving us diabetes and heart disease and cancers - pre-eminent over an agriculture that is simply and by all common-sense, good?

Discrimination.

Look hard at that word. It is unfamiliar within the paradigm of agriculture but it is the unseen bedrock reality and it is the source of all the insanity mentioned above.

To read more ....

Monsanto and the Big Fat Lie of Food Safety

2011-08-17T20:01:00.002-04:00

By M. Gray

Vandana Shiva doesn't mince words. Food safety is food fascism.

"Risk Assessment in the hands of centralized corruptible agencies is no protection for consumers as the disease and health epidemic in the U.S. linked to over processed, industrial foods shows. Even while the U.S. is at the epicenter of the food related public health crises, the U.S. government is trying to export its Food laws which deregulate the industry and over regulate ordinary citizens and small enterprise. This deregulation of the big and toxic and over regulation of the small and ecological is at the core of Food Facism ..."

Goebbels is equally straightforward.

"If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State."

What's the truth?

Michael Taylor, the Monsanto executive who gave this country rBGH, deregulated GMOs, and kept GMOs all unlabeled, thanks to Obama, is "The Food Safety Czar" at the FDA.

That Czar, whom Jeffrey Smith at the Institute for Responsible Technology calls "[t]he person who may be responsible for more food-related illness and death than anyone in history," has been using "food safety" as a weapon against small local farms and local food co-ops.

To read more ....

Vaccines as cluster bombs

2011-08-17T19:58:00.001-04:00

Shiv Chopra, the Canadian microbiologist known for having helped stop the approval of rBGH, did so not by making true but complex arguments about its association to cancers, but by reducing the issue to an undeniable biological fact and thus simple legal issue.

The law said that no factory containing so much as a single rat dropping or feather is considered clean. rBGH gives cows mastitis which leads to pus in their milk. rBGH thus turns cows into pus factories.

Wikipedia (articles there on vaccines appear to have been written by industry), says that “Vaccines are among the greatest achievements of modern medicine.” Dr. Chopra calls them “cluster bombs.”

“A vaccine is a biological preparation that improves immunity to a particular disease.” Dr. Chopra says vaccines do nothing of the sort and, in fact, violate the very laws of biology.

As with rBGH, he has a talent for reducing things to understandable and undeniable facts and when it comes to vaccines, he begins at the beginning by describing how the immune system works to protect people from disease.

He says there is a constant war going on between an individual’s bodily integrity and invading organisms.

Most people would most easily recognize this war when they think of bodies rejecting organs from another person or animal. That very same rejection occurs at a microlevel – against foreign viruses and bacteria. But rejecting what is foreign, no matter the size, is not just a nice thing or just “how the immune system protects the body” but it does so for a cardinal purpose – to maintain bodily integrity.

And the definition of “integrity” is crucial to understanding the brilliance of the immune system. “Integrity: the quality or state of being complete; unbroken condition; wholeness; entirety; the quality or state of being unimpaired; perfect condition …”

In the simplest terms, Dr. Chopra explains that the immune system maintains wholeness or “self” versus “non-self” in the face of invaders.

And it is precisely that wholeness or integrity which vaccines destroy.

The immune system works by breaking down whatever foreign matter enters your body – be it protein, fat, starch or sugar – into single molecules in the digestive system. Starches and sugar must be broken into glucose, fat to fatty acids, and proteins into amino acids. The last two the body then takes and rebuilds into the person’s own, no longer foreign, protein and fat. Anything that remains foreign is and must be rejected.

Bodily integrity must be maintained so the immune system repels invaders by breaking them to pieces or ejecting or destroying them.

In this context, sneezing, coughing, diarrhea, vomiting can be appreciated as protective immune mechanisms to get rid of foreign protein or other matter, while foreign material that gets past into the body is deconstructed by the gut and fever is stimulated as a means weaken or destroy it.

With this background, one understands that in four steps, Dr. Chopra is laying bare the core scientific fallacy of vaccines.

Chopra says that anyone knowing the basics of biology should know:

1. That all vaccines by their very nature are antigens and that every antigen by defintion must be a foreign protein …;

2. That no foreign protein can be absorbed into the blood stream unless it is digested in the alimentary canal into its basic amino acids;

3. That it is these amino acids which after being absorbed into the blood stream are reconstituted into one’s own proteins and it is these proteins which distinguishes every being of existence into self and non-self.

4. That any interference or tampering with these laws of existence can bring calamity to the being in which it occurs such as by causing auto-immune conditions like autism, etc.

Why calamity?

What happens is that vaccines force foreign protein into the body, bypassing all mechanisms used by the immune system to avoid such invasion.

Think of organ transplants. The immune system must rid itself of what is foreign. It will not stop until it has. It will attack itself to do so if necessary – so fundamental is integrity of self versus invader.

Imagine this were happening to your own home. People have doors and windows and alarm systems exactly to stop invaders. Normally we think of them coming to steal but imagine they came to stay, to take over. The need to eject them and keep the home your own would be unceasing. Imagine they came in not through the doors or windows for which you had defenses, but through the chimney, through the ventilation system, though the electrical system, and there was no way to be rid of them. Would it be your home anymore? Would you be safe? Would you ever be able to function normally again or would you be on a permanent state of high alert and stress trying again and again to get rid of them? Might you throw things and damage the walls, or shoot and break things, tearing up your own home? Would you become exhausted? Might you break down physically from trying, but could you ever stop trying? If you did, would it not mean it was no longer your home, but indistinguishable from theirs or maybe even more theirs, having defeated you?

So what happens to the immune system when vaccines jump past its neutralization of foreign proteins before they can enter the bloodstream, and instead foreign matter is injected into the body? Just like you, the immune system must attack whatever is shot into it, and in being unable to rid itself of that matter or break it down, it attacks again and again, attacking the body itself. Thus, autoimmune reactions, which are self-attacks. The more vaccines, the more foreign protein is being shot into the body, the more the reactions, the more the body attacks itself.

Vaccines do not, as claimed, “improve immunity.” Even the most rudimentary understanding of what the immune system does would make that obvious. Vaccines jump the immune system to deliver foreign matter that could never have gotten past it otherwise. This is foreign matter that the immune system is left helplessly unable to rid itself of. Foreign matter is lodged permanently in the body, leaving it no longer perfect but broken, impaired. Bodily integrity is literally destroyed.

From Should I Vaccinate My Child? by Patel Thompson:

“[R]esearchers argue that these attenuated forms of the viruses remain in the body causing continual antigenic stimulation of the immune system – meaning the immune system is always in ‘attack’ mode – which also weakens it and leads to auto-immune diseases.

“A placebo-controlled trial of acellular pertussis vaccines in Sweden compared vaccinated children with un-vaccinated children of the same birth grouping. During the trial, an invasive bacterial infection occurred among the vaccinated group resulting in numerous deaths. A review of the trial data led researchers to conclude that ‘The hypothesis of an immunosuppressive effect of the vaccines, which would explain the deaths…could not be refuted by the data.’ (xvi)

“As further evidence, one of the few double-blind trials that have ever been conducted on a vaccine shows the same immunosuppressive effect. In the trial, of the group who were vaccinated with the Salk polio vaccine, over 200 people went on to contract polio. Among the control group (unvaccinated), not one of them developed polio. (xvii)

“Citing references from numerous valid sources, including four recognized textbooks on paediatrics and immunology, Harold Buttram, MD and John Hoffman, PhD, conclude that childhood vaccination “cannot help but have adverse effects on the immunologic system of the child, possibly leaving this system crippled in its ability to protect the child throughout life…opening the way for other diseases as a result of immunologic dysfunction.” (xviii)

And it is not only foreign virus or bacteria that causes a problem. Chopra writes:

“The foreign proteins in vaccines originate from not only the infectious organisms against which one wishes to produce infection-fighting antibodies but also the artificial media in which these organisms are grown. Contained in such media may include one or more of the following materials: bovine serum, horse serum, chicken egg, monkey kidney, insect cells and even human fetal cells.

“Apart from the foreign proteins, vaccines may also contain other harmful substances, including mercury, aluminum, formalin, oily adjuvants, etc., plus untold number of stray viruses with the potential to cause cancer, HIV, serum-hepatitis, and so on.”

The body is being filled with foreign protein from other human beings and from other species, none of which the immune system can expel, and yet it must if it is to maintain functional integrity – keeping the distinction between “self” and non-self.

“Meanwhile, evidence indicates that except for smallpox, no other infectious disease, e.g.: tuberculosis, cholera, typhoid, anthrax, measles, mumps, rubella, DPT, polio, influenza and others, has been eradicated and that this continues to be so despite the decades of vaccinations against each of these diseases.

“Also, during the same period, the incidence of many previously uncommon diseases such as autism, diabetes, allergies, and cancer, has been increasing in pandemic proportions.”

The person is now contaminated with foreign matter, the “invader” now residing the body, the body attacking itself.

Patel Thompson, again:

“Vaccinal attenuated viruses attach their own genetic ‘episome’ to the genome (half set of chromosomes and their genes) of the host cell, and are thus capable of surviving or remaining latent within the host cells for years. The presence of foreign antigenic material within the host cell sets the stage for their unpredictable provocation of various auto-immune phenomena such as herpes, shingles, warts, tumors – both benign and malignant – and diseases of the central nervous system, such as varied forms of paralysis and inflammation of the brain.” (xix)

“Dr. Markowitz states that in addition, vaccines do not just produce mild versions of the original disease, but all of them commonly produce a variety of their own symptoms. In some cases, ‘these illnesses may be considerably more serious than the original disease, involving deeper structures, more vital organs, and less of a tendency to resolve spontaneously. Even more worrisome is the fact that they are almost always more difficult to recognize.’” (xx)

“In addressing scientists at a conference sponsored by the American Cancer Society, Rutgers University professor R. Simpson warned:

“‘Immunization Programs against flu, measles, mumps, polio and so forth may actually be seeding humans with RNA to form latent proviruses in cells throughout the body. These latent proviruses could be molecules in search of diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, Parkinson’s disease and perhaps cancer.’” (xxi)

In claiming vaccines “improve immunity,” the pharmaceutical industry seems to have no idea that the purpose of the immune system is not just to react but to protect biologic integrity, core to human health and life. Instead, the industry is filling the body with foreign protein, devastating the human immune system. They are using vaccines containing foreign DNA and a long list of toxic substances that “explode inside the body and hit every part of the body, every cell and molecule” – the “cluster bomb” Chopra speaks of.

So distant is the pharmaceutical industry from protecting immune function that with each “generation” of vaccines, the vaccines become more harmful. They went from inserting whole viruses which they now admit were causing the very diseases they were supposed to prevent, to using “recombinant components” (genetically engineered pieces) of a number of viruses, but still they could not get the response they wanted. So, now they have moved to the third generation of vaccines, DNA vaccines, that inject genetically engineered matter. Are they called DNA vaccines because they are supposed to be taken up by the person’s DNA?

If so, they would be hitting not just organs and cells but would potentially be contaminating the very biologic code of the person’s life, their DNA.

If this occurs, now the home invader analogy would include mutant (genetically engineered) invaders who would take over the host’s body, as well as her house.

If the new vaccines can imbed or cross contaminate with mutant (genetically engineered) pathogens that affect the DNA, vaccination would be undermining the integrity of self in terms of its instructional messages, the biologic coding of the runs everything in the human body. The immune system would be left struggling at a much deeper level of reaction, a spasm of reaction. The most core functions of the body, such as mitochondrial function (basic energy production) might be disrupted.

Was Wakefield seeing damage to fundamental bodily integrity, in seeing mitochondrial dysfunction? Was Robin MacNeil of PBS seeing it as well in his own sick autistic grandson?

Chopra’s explanation of the immune system and how vaccination bypasses the immune system and leaves in place just what the immune system is tasked to get rid of (foreign protein), makes apparent why it is mistaken to refer to vaccination as “immunization.” Vaccines damage the immune system. Vaccination would more appropriately be called “anti-immunization.”

Patel Thompson says:

“The bulk of the evidence gathered from numerous countries points out that not only is vaccination ineffective at preventing the spread of infectious disease, but vaccinated children are actually at a higher risk of contracting these illnesses. In addition, the adverse reactions to vaccination are much higher than presently documented in the medico-pharmaceutical literature and the long-term damaging effect of suppressing the immune system is rarely addressed.

“In light of all the evidence to the contrary, why have vaccines been pressed upon the public as a necessary, beneficial way of preventing our children from getting sick? In the words of Dr. Raymond Obomsawin (who’s held senior positions in UNICEF and CUSO), referring to mass vaccination, “It is reprehensible that such actions continue to be enforced by authorities, while parents and local health workers are not accorded any practical knowledge of the known dangers involved, and the extent to which there prevails a general ignorance of the longer term consequences.” (xxii)

Patel Thompson is not alone in seeing that something other than science is behind vaccines.

“Combine this ignorance with the millions of dollars in profit generated by vaccination that goes straight into the pockets of manufacturing companies, governments and medical doctors, and it becomes clear that vaccination is more of a political and economic issue, than a health issue.”

One sees that reality in the behavior of those invested in vaccines, such as Bill Gates. Rather than addressing the solid and increasing scientific evidence exposing the biologic irrationality of his massive financial commitment in vaccines (as well as the extreme danger a leading scientist is warning of), he is instead suggesting now that those who question his investment (vaccines) are committing involuntary manslaughter. Did the pharmaceutical industry insert the article on vaccines in Wikipedia? It too suggests that expression of concerns over vaccines are tantamount to manslaughter.

“[C]oncern has been raised [by anyone not financially connected to vaccine production?] that spreading unfounded information about the medical risks of vaccines increases rates of life-threatening infections, not only in the children whose parents refused vaccinations, but also in other children, perhaps too young for vaccines, who could contract infections from unvaccinated carriers (see herd immunity). A more extreme response to this concern is the claim that spreading false information about vaccine risks amounts to involuntary manslaughter, claiming that celebrity promotion of the vaccine-autism link was followed by “an increase in the number of vaccine preventable illnesses as well as an increase in the number of vaccine preventable deaths” and thus “may be indirectly responsible for at least some of these illnesses and deaths.” (Wikipedia, Vaccines) [Emphasis added.]

As the above quote indicates, the promotion of vaccines is relying on fear. Vaccine investors are using it (fear of swine flu, of meningitis, of hepatitis, of cervical cancer, of common childhood diseases – adding new fears all the time) to try to put in place the ultimate form of marketing – government mandates of their products. But educated people are learning that vaccines suppress and even damage the immune system, which is essential for fighting off diseases, and that vaccines were not responsible for the decrease in infectious diseases but can actually increase diseases.

So, to stop such information and the spreading rejection of vaccines, those invested in vaccines (with 200 more in the works) are portraying information (concerns, questions, etc.) about vaccines as lethal.

Yet the pharmaceutical industry and Bill Gates cannot dispute the central biologic fact about vaccines – they are catastrophic to the immune system and it is the immune system that keeps people well or heals them of disease. The “science” behind the new vaccines is so shaky, the pharmaceutical industry admits it doesn’t know how their DNA vaccines, which are based on “DNA uptake,” are alleged to work:

“This phenomenon has not been the subject of much research, so the actual mechanism of DNA uptake is not known.” (Wikipedia)

Ignorance of the immune system combined with intense international promotion of an early pharma product (aspirin) is now associated with deaths during 1918, not a flu or virus. The National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases discovered that common upper respiratory bacteria were responsible for the deaths, nothing viral. Aspirin is thought to have played a part as doctors did not realize it suppresses the immune system (or the value of fever), and that suppression allowed infections to take hold and worsen.

Additionally, aspirin killed healthy people outright (“well in the morning, dead by evening”) because of medical ignorance of its toxic qualities. Government, medical, and industry promotion came together to urge aspirin on the world, and multiplied the losses. (And now coming to light is the corollary – natural practitioners who avoided aspirin and supported immune system function, had stunning success in saving lives.)

Vaccines are promoted as a miracle of modern medicine, just as aspirin was touted in 1918. The WHO even promotes vaccines as the means to save the world from another flu pandemic like 1918. But 1918 wasn’t a flu pandemic in the first place! To counter how many times people were wrongly told that a virulent virus (or flu) killed millions in 1918, it bears repeating that there was no flu pandemic in 1918 and that there has never been a flu pandemic in human history that killed millions.

Instead, 1918 appears most likely to have been a pharmaceutical disaster of global proportions based on global distribution of aspirin and global advertising.

Vaccines make no sense as any response to 1918 unless the drug industry wishes to replicate the calamity of 1918 by intensely promoting yet another pharmaceutical industry product which even more severely suppresses the immune system than aspirin and can permanently damage it. Today the pharmaceutical industry has gone further than promotion, and has gotten laws in place which mandate their “immune system damaging” product to everyone, without exception.

The millions of 1918 deaths offer a dire warning against any product – no matter how much said to prevent death, no matter how much fear-mongering, no matter how much government agencies, medical authorities, or industry spokespeople urge – that tampers with the immune system.

Vaccines don’t just tamper. Vaccines are cluster bombs.

Corporations have redefined food as "stuff"

2011-08-17T19:56:00.000-04:00

E Bronstein
Salem-News.com
Sat, 18 Jun 2011 16:35 CDT

Countries define food as "any item that is to be processed, partially processed, or unprocessed for consumption."

While the The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) recognition of the human right to food remains in place, the definition of food itself has been hollowed out. Some countries have created a new legal definition of food. It does not include any reference to the core aspects of food - sustaining life.

Food is defined as "any substance consumed to provide nutritional support for the body. It is usually of plant or animal origin, and contains essential nutrients, such as carbohydrates, fats, proteins, vitamins, or minerals. The substance is ingested by an organism and assimilated by the organism's cells in an effort to produce energy, maintain life, and/or stimulate growth."

In the legal definition, the essence food - what is in it, what it does - is not considered, only what is done to it or with it. These countries define food as "any item that is to be processed, partially processed, or unprocessed for consumption." Perhaps in recognition of the removal from food of what makes it food rather than any other material, the word "food stuffs" is used, which include any substance to be ingested by humans. This could be "stuff" insufficient to sustain life or even antithetical to it.

To read more ....

OUR LAND - COLLATERAL FOR THE NATIONAL DEBT

2011-08-17T19:52:00.003-04:00

Derry Brownfield
August 17, 2007
NewsWithViews.com
I consider Wayne Hage one of the most intelligent men I ever met. On our very first visit he was explaining the World Bank, the International Monetary fund and how the world bankers planned on collateralizing the world debt with land. Not just the U.S. national debt, but the “WORLD” debt. A listener sent me a copy of a report of the FOURTH WORLD WILDERNESS CONGRESS, which was held in Denver in 1987. Over 1500 people from sixty countries were told that wilderness lands were to protect the reindeer, the spotted owl and other endangered species. Ninety percent of the group consisted of conservationists, ecologists, government and United Nations bureaucrats. The other ten percent were world banking heavyweights, such as David Rockefeller of Chase Manhattan Bank, London banker Edmund de Rothschild and the Secretary of the U.S. Treasury, James Baker, who gave the keynote address. George W. Hunt, an investment councilor, served as official host and sat in on all the meetings. It was George Hunt that wrote the report from which I have gleaned much of my information.
To read more ....

A National Response to Two FDA Armed Raids on Rawesome

2011-08-17T19:47:00.002-04:00

By Victor Rawls

The two SWAT team raids ordered by the FDA on Rawesome, an organic food coop in LA, represent “food safety” come home to roost, in all its vulture reality. First time, they used armed FBI; the second time, having faced such still resistance from non-resisting people, they multiplied their attack using armed LA police, Ventura County Sheriffs, the California Department of Ag and several other agencies.

People across the country are stunned and enraged, but most are not aware of the one small thing which has allowed this to occur. To understand how key that little detail is, one must go back to how “food safety” got its power and how it works its magic.

To read more ....

Monsanto’s FDA Goes After the Country’s Only Safe Milk

2011-08-17T19:45:00.001-04:00

Posted on August 5, 2011

by geobear7

By Yumi Dood

Dairy is central to both the food supply and to sustainable agriculture. The FDA (run by Monsanto) is taking it apart. Rather than being harmful, raw milk is the only safe milk in the US and has innumerable benefits not found in pasteurized milk.

The health community (doctors, researchers, public health officials) need to stop being misled by corporate media and find out what is happening to their own food. They might be interested to know that the new “food safety” law that gave so much power to the FDA to go after big corporate facilities with deadly contamination is being used just as farmers said it would be — to get rid of access to safe food and shut down natural and organic farmers.

They might also be surprised to learn that Obama put Monsanto in a position to be in charge of all food and farms in the US by making a Monsanto VP named Michael Taylor, Czar of the food safety division of the FDA. That division (that is to say, Monsanto) is in court right now attempting to remove the right to choose food, consume or feed our children the food of our choice, the right to contract between ourselves (for it or anything else), and the right to our bodily and physical health. Worse, the case appears rigged to be lost and to leave those precedents.

Will the scientific/medical/public health community wake up to what is happening and the threat to their own food supply? How quickly can they then begin to appreciate that they got duped on what is safe and what is dangerous.

It turns out that pasteurized milk doesn’t reach a high enough temperature to kill off the Crohn’s bacterium getting into the milk from the sick cows in the industrial dairy herd. The temperature is high enough to destroy enzymes and friendly bacteria, though.

To read more ....

Murdoch and Vaccines: Exposure of Crimes Reveals a Much Larger Story

2011-08-17T19:40:00.002-04:00

Posted on July 17, 2011 by coto2admin| 50 Comments

By William Newton

“… the evidence of sleazy and scandalous behavior of the Murdoch papers has expanded geometrically.” Michael CollinsRupert Murdoch’s news empire faces intense media and legal scrutiny. Current revelations focus on Murdoch’s News of the World hacking into the Dowler family’s voice messages during the kidnapping of their 12 year old daughter Milly, and Murdoch’s London Times for allegedly having illegally obtained the financial, property and medical information of former UK Labour Party Leader Gordon Brown during the time he was chancellor. [Image]

A 2010 exposure of Murdoch’s Times of Londonrevealed that it had published forged documents purporting to show that Iran planned to do nuclear experiments for an atomic weapon, and as Collins points out, it was Murdoch’s “drumbeat of misinformation” that helped mislead people into believing that Saddam Hussein was involved in the 9/11 attack, supporting Bush’s invasion of Iraq, though intelligence was “unsubstantiated, contradicted, or even non-existent,” according to theSenate Intelligence Committee Unveils Final Phase II Reports on Prewar Iraq Intelligence from June 5, 2008.

But what has not yet been covered is the media circus Murdoch’s London Times created internationally as it fabricated lies against a respected British doctor, with consequences that could impact the lives of billions of children in the world.

The London Times headlines read:

To read more ....

The Monsanto Anschluss: Long Laid Plans to Undo the Rule of Law

2011-08-17T19:36:00.000-04:00

Posted on August 7, 2011

by geobear7| 23 Comments

By William Clover

To begin to appreciate the scope of Monsanto’s attack on the American people, one can look in three places, beginning with the USDA’s ruling on genetically modified Kentucky Bluegrass, and the agricultural – that is to say, food – element involved.

Kentucky bluegrass is one of four primarygrasses foraged by or fed to grass-fed animals, along with alfalfa (the GM version of which has also been approved).

It is a inadequate to speak only of GM “lawns” (though the impact of its use for lawns is huge) when the entire organic meat and dairy industry is also threatened by GM bluegrass.

Jeffrey Smith of the Institute for Responsible Technology sums up the seriousness of the deregulation that is occurring:

To read more ....

Ralph Nader and the flaming Pinto vaccines

2010-11-05T21:04:00.004-04:00

by S. Stone

The H1N1 flu vaccines are the flaming Pinto of vaccines. Ralph Nader is badly needed.

Joseph Mercola reports that the product has already been proven to be sickening and even killing people.

By June of 2010, more than 1,000 adverse reactions in children under the age of 5 resulted in the Australian government's banning of flu vaccines for that age group.High fevers, vomiting and convulsions were the most widely reported reactions, which are also associated with long-term adverse health outcomes.

Australian "public health experts have called for an independent body to monitor drug safety after it emerged that young children were more likely to end up in hospitals because of side effects from a flu vaccine than they were from the disease itself.

In Finland, France and Sweden, narcolepsy was reported in teenage children in response to Pandemrix monovalent swine flu vaccine, leading the Finnish government to suspend its use.

In Korea, nearly 2,600 swine flu vaccine side effects were reported as of August 2010, ranging from allergic reactions to fevers to headaches—and including 10 deaths.

According to Barbara Loe Fisher of the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC), a special government committee has been created to investigate last year's H1N1 monovalent vaccine for signs it may be associated with more adverse reactions. What the committee found out provisionally is there were three signs of trouble with the H1N1 swine flu vaccine used last year

Fisher outlined these three primary health concerns in a recent NVIC video update:

Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS), an autoimmune disease which has been associated with influenza vaccine since 1976, when the swine flu vaccine was first used. In fact, British government health experts acknowledged the link between the H1N1 vaccine and an increased risk of GBS earlier this month. Prior to this public admittance, the government had always denied such a link

Idiopathic thrombocytopenia purpura (ITP), an autoimmune disorder, is a blood clotting disorder characterized by insufficient platelets

Bell's palsy, a reaction causing temporary facial paralysis

But Nader would face a new product safety terrain, since the US government has become the marketing and PR agent for the manufacturers of this deadly product and during Bush, arranged
"medical martial laws" to force it on people.

The other day, I went into a Walgreens store. The store had numerous signs along the road beside it urging people to get their flu shots which I'd never seen done before. And when I went in, before I was even in the door, I was greeted with an invitation to get a flu vaccine. I responded, "Are you joking?" The greeter mumbled something about being forced to say it and it was and walked off. I went to the pharmacy to object and there was met with signs for flu shots, gift cards for flu shots, and the hello from the pharmacist was "Have you had your flu shot yet?"

To be quite frank, it was more than a little off-putting. When I told the pharmacist that, he apologized and said he felt guilty greeting people like that, and even worse giving them the vaccines, because he has never taken a flu shot in his life, doesn't intend to, and doesn't think they're safe. He said it was a new corporate policy and it disturbed him.

The whole H1N1 vaccine (now buried in the seasonal "flu" shot) is part of the most aggressive vaccine campaign ever seen here. People can and have lost jobs for not submitting to this vaccine, one that has never been tested by safety, has no record of efficacy, contains nanoparticles associated with DNA damage, has caused Guillaume Barre, comas, seizures, miscarriages and deaths. And the more flaming the Pinto vaccine is, the more the CDC pushes it.

Since it's clear they are not saving people from anything with the vaccine, what are they doing then? Some say just making money for the vaccine companies. Some say intending to intentionally harm people. But whatever they are doing, truth and human rights are out the window.

The justification for these flaming vaccines was last year's "pandemic." The EU Parliament exposed it was faked and a kickback scheme between the drug companies and the WHO. Media has not covered that here but media is closely connected to the makers of the flaming vaccines.

The British Medical Journal was openly critical of the "pandemic" itself and the WHO.

'A joint investigation by the BMJ and the Bureau of Investigative Journalism has uncovered evidence that raises troubling questions about how WHO managed conflicts of interest among the scientists who advised its pandemic planning, and about the transparency of the science underlying its advice to governments. Was it appropriate for WHO to take advice from experts who had declarable financial and research ties with pharmaceutical companies producing antivirals and influenza vaccines? Why was key WHO guidance authored by an influenza expert who had received payment for other work from Roche, manufacturers of oseltamivir, and GlaxoSmithKline, manufacturers of zanamivir? And why does the composition of the emergency committee from which Chan sought guidance remain a secret known only to those within WHO? We are left wondering whether major public health organisations are able to effectively manage the conflicts of interest that are inherent in medical science.'

And the man at the WHO who is the leading "pandemic fear" monger there - from SARS to Ebola to Avian flu to Swine Flu - is under investigation himself for corruption around all this.

"For the past 6 months, one could barely switch on the television in the Netherlands without seeing the face of famed virus hunter Albert Osterhaus talking about the swine flu pandemic. Or so it has seemed. Osterhaus, who runs an internationally renowned virus lab at Erasmus Medical Center, has been Mr. Flu. But last week, his reputation took a nosedive after it was alleged that he has been stoking pandemic fears to promote his own business interests in vaccine development. As Science went to press, the Dutch House of Representatives had even slated an emergency debate about the matter. ...

In an interview with Der Spiegel magazine in Germany, epidemiologist Dr. Tom Jefferson of the Cochrane Collaboration, an organization of independent scientists evaluating all flu related studies, noted the implications of the privatization of WHO and the commercialization of health:

"…one of the extraordinary features of this influenza -- and the whole influenza saga -- is that there are some people who make predictions year after year, and they get worse and worse. None of them so far have come about, and these people are still there making these predictions. For example, what happened with the bird flu, which was supposed to kill us all? Nothing. But that doesn't stop these people from always making their predictions. Sometimes you get the feeling that there is a whole industry almost waiting for a pandemic to occur.

SPIEGEL: Who do you mean? The World Health Organization (WHO)?

Jefferson: The WHO and public health officials, virologists and the pharmaceutical companies. They've built this machine around the impending pandemic. And there's a lot of money involved, and influence, and careers, and entire institutions! And all it took was one of these influenza viruses to mutate to start the machine grinding...

Along those lines, the CDC which is now saying that everyone over six months should take the vaccines is the same CDC which put out entirely false numbers on the numbers of H1N1 cases last year and may be falsifying data on the number of miscarriages the H1N1 vaccine has caused.

In a relevant footnote, the Washington Post on December 8 in an article on the severity, or lack of same, of the world H1N1 „pandemic" reported that "with the second wave of H1N1 infections having crested in the United States, leading epidemiologists are predicting that the pandemic could end up ranking as the mildest since modern medicine began documenting influenza outbreaks."

We are smack dab in the middle of a pharmaceutical industry fiction, in which a corporation is yet again stealing billions from the public, and it would be really disgusting if it weren't much more - grotesquely dangerous to life.

Vaccines are not a regular product. Would you buy a product when you don't know for sure what is in it, but what is known is clearly toxic, when the package insert states that a percentage of people using that product will die, when the product isn't tested for safety and there is no proof it even works for what it is advertised to do, when the companies making the product which doesn't necessarily work but has a chance of killing you are immune from all liability? And what would you think of the government working for the companies making the product - which you know now is killing people - and using its power on behalf of the corporations to mandate the product or even use the military to force it on you?

And, incredibly, the government has recently created a new rule for the vaccine manufacturers which are already not testing the vaccines, letting them add or change any ingredient with the approval of only one FDA employee (the janitor?). Squalene is not approved in the US because of its link to Gulf War Syndrome. The H1N1 in Europe contained a millions times that dosage, with one doctor there saying it appeared "murderous" to him. Bush, who set in motion the whole pandemic apparatus and inserted the pandemic martial laws, spoke of vaccines with squalene here, and Obama's stimulus package included a large contract for HHS and Novartis to produce it (and cell cultures from dog kidneys). Which means that as bad as the flaming Pinto vaccines already are, at any moment now the manufacturers could include an ingredient associated arthritis, fibromyalgia, lymphadenopathy, rashes, photosensitive rashes, malar rashes, chronic fatigue, chronic headaches, abnormal body hair loss, non-healing skin lesions, aphthous ulcers, dizziness, weakness, memory loss, seizures, mood changes, neuropsychiatric problems, anti-thyroid effects, anaemia, elevated ESR (erythrocyte sedimentation rate), systemic lupus erythematosus, multiple sclerosis, ALS (amyotrophic lateral sclerosis), Raynaud's phenomenon, Sjorgren's syndrome, chronic diarrhoea, night sweats and low-grade fevers.

Think of the Pinto. You know it doesn't work right, you know tests show things could go badly wrong and burn people to death, you know that has actually been happening. But the government is withdrawing it but ordering you not only to buy it but to have to drive it - and with your wife and kids in it. Imagine if you say "no" because you don't want to risk it, and you lose your job for that. Imagine the government not only doesn't recall it but creates a rule to let the company put in a part banned in the US. Imagine the government, for the sake of the company, declares a national emergency and says the Pinto now needs no testing at all, and everyone must drive it, and if you don't drive it, the military will give you a choice between going to prison or having you and your whole family strapped into it and being forced to step on the gas.

The difference between the flaming Pinto and the flaming vaccines is you could bail out of the Pinto. They aren't jamming it into your body to have unknown effects for the rest of your and your family's life.

And then when one considers the source of the flaming Pinto vaccine, the pharmaceutical industry, it doesn't reassure that they are one of the most criminally corrupt industries here (they recently won that prize), and that is putting aside their history of being literal war criminals, including killing people with vaccines. It also doesn't reassure that the Nuremberg Code was designed to protect people from being forced into medical experiments but with the mandating of vaccines (which the pharmaceutical industry has arranged through the WHO and various governments over which it has great influence), it entirely evades the very code designed to protect human beings from forced medical "experiments" or "treatments." Through their dark connection to George Bush, they have managed to arrange a potential replay of such forced "treatments."

The manufacturers doesn't have to do squat to prove the flaming Pinto vaccines are safe, and just like with the car, there is already evidence they are in fact very dangerous. Nader got the Pinto recalled. But now, instead of the vaccines being recalled, the public is caught in an unreal but nightmarish corporate scheme in which government plays the PR agent for the pharmaceutical industry, removing their liability, installing laws to mandate their products, putting out false data to scare people into taking something that the government should be protecting people from, and has even arranged to have military on the ground - for a flu? - to force their product on people.

The flaming Pinto H1N1 flu vaccines are a product. And a very bum one at that. There is no pandemic and never was. The H1N1 "pandemic" is a financial and medical and political/military scandal. And the CDC is part of it. It and HHS are not caring health agencies trying to protect the public from a health threat but unconstitutional collusive partners with pharmaceutical corporations, letting them use government power to force their potentially deadly products not just on people but INTO them.

Clearly, the government has no right to subject their own citizens to something that can maim, sterilize or kill them. Ralph Nader needs to revamp what "product safety" means today in the context of corporations using government to fake disease scares and to force products on people which they not only don't want but which could kill them.

The CDC itself says, based on manufacturers' own package inserts - which would tend to understate the danger - that 30,000 people would be expected to die from the H1N1 vaccine. Something is terribly wrong with this vaccine picture.

Would it have been all right for the government to give immunity from liability for the Pinto manufacturers? Would it have been okay for Pinto to have included an insert saying how many people could expect to be burned to death from the car - a kind of warning - while then getting the government to force people into it?

Add together the WWII history of the companies, the ties to Bush, the faked pandemic and terror-mongering for profit and WHO corruption, their non-testing, their non-efficacy, their toxic ingredients, the medical martial laws Bush put in place to try to force them, the disorders and deaths they are already causing, and the Flaming Pinto vaccines may be the most hellish commercial products ever created.

Leaked trade agreements and hidden things inside S 510: Corporations plan to end normal farming

2010-10-24T22:00:00.009-04:00

M. Gardner

The Canadian Farmers Union wants the Canada-EU trade deal scrapped.

Under provisions in CETA [Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement], using saved seed could result in a farmer's land, equipment, and crops being seized for alleged infringement of intellectual property rights attached to plant varieties owned by corporations such as Monsanto, Dow, Syngenta, and Bayer.

"It includes the freezing of bank accounts too, so you couldn't even defend yourself in court. And this is for alleged infringement," says NFU [National Farmers Union] president Terry Boehm. ...

"These are the most draconian measures possible and they would literally create a culture of fear in the farm population where, I think, that ultimately farmers would end up buying seeds every year for every acre just to avoid prosecution or the threat of prosecution."

The biotech industry is facing exposure of the health dangers of GMO/pesticide dependent crops, of attacks on scientists (even armed ones), and GMOs' poor crop performance across different crops, public outrage at no labeling of GMOs, media scorn at its humiliatingly poor science, and falling stock value. Is the industry now attempting an end run around all this, by trying to criminalize and thus end normal (organic) farming - its increasingly sought after, healthy, higher-performing competition?

Given the "draconian property rights enforcement measures" the biotech corporations wish put into effect through the Canada-EU free trade agreement, one might wonder.

US farmers face the same assault by their own government on behalf of agribusiness and the biotech industry. S 510, a "food safety" bill waiting for the Senate return, would put the US fully under the WTO and thus harmonize with CETA. It is replete with means to do to American farmers what the EU/Canada CETA plan would do to Canadian ones - and potentially more, including surreptitiously arranging to criminalize agricultural water, manure, essential farming equipment, and seed storage.

41 words inside S 510 would make the US subject to CETA.

COMPLIANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS.

Nothing in this Act (or an amendment made by this Act) shall be construed in a manner inconsistent with the agreement establishing the World Trade Organization or any other treaty or international agreement to which the United States is a party.

The significance of those words in S 510 is that they would end the Uruguay Round Agreement Act of 1994, which put US sovereignty and US law under perfect protection. Under S 510, US law would become subservient to the WTO, a corporate organization. Votes in the US would not matter. The decisions on food, energy, health, resources, and US economic policy would be made the very corporations responsible for contaminating food, oil spills, dangerous drugs, theft of common resources, and destroying the economy.

The enforcement powers created by S 510 (assuming it resembles other "food safety" bills) would be unlimited and apply to everyone in the country who "holds" food (does anyone not?).

S 510, a "food safety" bill, would (using sections from other food safety bills) set up a corporate court outside the constitutional court system. The expectation is that it would be run by Monsanto, just as "food safety" at the FDA is now, with Monsanto involved at every level. It would exist without Congressional oversight, with unlimited and unspecified remedies, "in addition to, and not exclusive of, other remedies that may be available," and without judicial review over even "the validity and appropriateness of the order ..."

That upturning of all sense (orders that don't have to be appropriate or valid) is a window into the extremity of power being sought by the corporations through S 510. That power would include total discretion to punish anyone they may wish. And in removing appropriateness and validity, their orders would not have to relate to food at all and could be used against anyone, applying any form of "remedy" they desire. Nothing whatever is excluded.

The merger of corporate and government power is defined as fascism.

LIMITATION ON REVIEW- In a civil action under paragraph (1), the validity and appropriateness of the order of the Administrator assessing the civil penalty shall not be subject to judicial review.

[Unless someone has died from a food related issue, which would put the case into a real criminal court, everything else would be "dealt with" as a civil penalty. S 510 includes long prison terms for mistakes in paperwork and "labeling" (to be defined at the discretion of those in charge), and from the leaked EU/Canada trade plans, seizures of farmers' crops and equipment and freezing of bank accounts are clearly sought.]

Remedies Not Exclusive- The remedies provided in this section are in addition to, and not exclusive of, other remedies that may be available.

While not listed as a civil "remedy" but treated as disease prevention, slaughter of their animals is another Orwellian measure within S 510 which goes well beyond seizures to military arrangements with the DOD and DHS. They would come onto farms and slaughter normal animals if any disease outbreak is announced, regardless of harmlessness. "Valid and appropriate" do not matter.

This is not a "food safety" bill, as even a short overview of S 510 makes clear.

S 510 offers numerous ways for corporations to get rid of farmers and take their land. The astounding falsity of forcing farmers (or anyone with a farm animal) to sign onto a international contract in which they lose their rights to their property is transparent. Taking global coordinates of the size and shape of farmers' land and feeding them into a corporate data bank, has nothing to do with tracing animal diseases. Farmers' addresses are known.

But the USDA lie about wanting to stop animal diseases grows especially repugnant when one with awareness that the USDA is actually working against the vehement protests of cattle ranchers, to import potentially diseased animals from Brazil and to transfer an off-shore animal disease lab to Kansas, the heart of cattle country and the most tornado prone state in the country, while it's well known that it was lab leaks in the UK which led to the slaughter of millions of cattle, whether ill or not.

Such mass slaughter of animals is structured by S 510 and is yet another gift to the biotech industry for without the extermination of normal animals, their investment in GE-animals and GMO meat is worthless.

The corporations, faced with public upset at ravages of industrial agriculture and the contaminated food coming out of it, are using fear of food, fear of minor animal diseases (including a faked H1N1 pandemic still promoted by government agencies), and lies and fraud to try to eliminate real farming in the US and to facilitate the theft of all US farmland.

The greed and hubris of S 510 pales in comparison to its unconstitutionality and danger to life.

The grass roots are saying no to S 510, each in their own idioms, whether by referring to the Constitution or to the Founding Fathers and to rights or to patriotism. Across the political spectrum, people are coming together to reject S 510 on constitutional and human rights grounds, and the plans of those behind this extreme corporate bill.

The corporate attempt to end US farming and set up their own court system over all Americans far outstrips the destruction of jobs, the forcing of millions from their homes, Citizens United, and the Wall Street theft. Now, through S 510, the corporations seek to remove all bounds on what they themselves do, on what they can do to any who oppose them, and on what they can seize. And this is only on the food side.

The threats to health are as profound. S 510 would remove the long sought cure for cancer as well as cures for an endless array of diseases, by removing access to supplements (one in particular). S 510 would suppress a medical revolution poised to free mankind from all fear of disease, leaving the country instead at the mercy of a pharmaceutical industry with a disturbing history and recent threatening actions with vaccines.

With S 510, those behind GMOs, vaccines, and drugs seek to remove access to normal farming, normal food and to nutrition (health) itself. They are seeking total dominance over what sustains life and over people.

S 510 is not a food safety bill. What is it, then? Is it a corporate enabling act? Does it open the door to corporate control over all Americans, all food supplies and health resources, and all US farmland?

Canadian Farmers Union are demanding that the draconian trade plans with the EU be scrapped. Will groups here demand the same of S 510?

Protecting the good things in life by stopping S 510

2010-10-22T12:31:00.003-04:00

by S. Marks

Ironically, there is much to be gained from the devastation of the US economy. Money has proved a false god. Others control it and buy democracy with it - courts, Congress, presidents, agencies. Corporate advertising wears thin. Is the new car model in the ad fun to drive past shuttered businesses and homeless people on the street?

A Great Age of Greed was sold to everyone via corporate media - want more, remodel yet again, be cool, faster, faster. Women who forwent extra income to stay home with their children were made to feel worthless, those going to work encouraged into an orgy of purchases to expiate guilt toward children they'd left. Children were taught to hunger for things, and then for new things. Everything, including sexuality, was commodified. The models for behavior became paid models, the dreams - those engineered by corporate executives with long term plans for how to bilk the society by breaking down all values that defended against excess and greed.

As all that "Trump"ed up excess now collapses into joblessness and homelessness, thanks to bank and corporate theft, what emerges from the rubble? Belief in something larger than ourselves - family, courage, nature, sharing, community, love .... All are there, none having "dropped in value," as material things do. They are the true riches in life, waiting to shelter everyone.

With all that has been lost, people are rethinking jobs dependent on others and what most simply provides enough to support life and many are seeing it comes down to the very basics - the earth and food. When people grow their own food and share with neighbors, they walk away from a money economy controlled by others. They do not pay for food and are not touched by food price rises, and they automatically protect their health. In all this, they become more connected to neighbors and to nature, increasingly skilled in self-sufficiency, and freer as people. This shift to simpler lives has so much offer, an increasing number of people are choosing it voluntarily and finding happiness.

The corporations are aware that if people can grow their own food and look after their health through good food, their investments in agribusiness and processed food and pharmaceuticals will wither. People dependent on supermarkets mean profit and as well as ill health and that in itself is worth a fortune. And people raising their own food, closely connected to neighbors, and with a strong sense of community values, are not the passive and ignorant consumers corporations depend on for sales.

Corporations have used advertising to dress up dangerous products and hide the reality of the food industry. They have also done all they could to suppress knowledge that natural substances have been curing disease after disease (with thousands of studies to back them up), and have raided those providing natural substances and imprisoned doctors for attempting to provide cures, for the pharmaceutical industry's investment and the power based on it would be destroyed by cures. It exists by fear and disease. An industry so corrupt the WHO is warning about it, it controls medicine and media. Occasionally, astounding media carries the truth and goes viral.

To ensure that stealing homes and jobs will force people into greater dependency and helplessness, rather than toward a free life, agribusiness, the food industry and the pharmaceutical industry (in many ways, indistinguishable) have introduced "food safety" bills into Congress that would shut off everyone's means to look after themselves, through food and nutritional health.

This article cannot begin to give adequate detail on how disturbing these bills are (e.g. threat to farmers, to gardens, to animals, to supplements, to human rights, to constitutional law).

"If accepted [S 510] would preclude the public's right to grow, own, trade, transport, share, feed and eat each and every food that nature makes. It will become the most offensive authority against the cultivation, trade and consumption of food and agricultural products of one's choice. It will be unconstitutional and contrary to natural law or, if you like, the will of God." ~Dr. Shiv Chopra, Canada Health whistleblower

Suffice to say, these are corporate bills and the corporations are at a crossroads in history and know it. Human beings have learned they are being made sick from toxic corporate products (e.g. food, drugs, vaccines, pesticides, hormones, antibiotics, housing materials, plastics) and are sick of it. They understand that health comes from clean food which comes only from clean and humane sources - all of them non-corporate. Corporations offer unclean, unsafe food and sickness, so people are increasingly buying directly from farmers and growing their own food. Corporate profit has no place in either. Rather than allow themselves to be bypassed, the only option the corporations have is to remove all other options (the decent ones) from the public, leaving only corporate products, which, in medicine, they are pushing through faked pandemics and behind the scenes state legislators to impose mandates.

From the public already robbed of jobs and homes, the corporations are set to steal the very basics of life now - food and health. They have arranged to end access to a known (but suppressed) cures for cancer and other diseases, and to safe food itself. The "food safety" bills - S 510 and S 3767 - would do both.

The public is on the cusp of a chance for a full and happy life of good food and assured health, and the freedom both imply. Or they face corporate control over their lives and premature deaths.

With such a clear alternative and so much good to be had, perhaps people will begin informing every possible person they know, so each person can in turn reach hundreds of others, and everyone can call and then continue calling Senators and emailing Senators (on their own websites) and faxing them.

No one should solely rely on organizations and "clicks" to do this work for them because many organizations that may sound "pro-people" receive funding from the very corporations and bankers behind these bills. Using organizations' "click system" is only all safe if it comes on top of each person's personal efforts to reach as many friends and family and colleagues as possible, and then to reach Senators on one's own.

The Dawn of A New Age in Medicine: Physics Offers A Unified Field Theory of All Disease

2010-10-17T14:26:00.009-04:00

by T H Reeme

For more than 75 years, a remarkable thing has been occurring in medicine - rapid and full cures of disease after disease by a single treatment. This major revolution in medical thought should have been heralded as the most wonderful possible news - other than world peace - in mankind's history. For we are now at the dawn of moment in medical science that is so immense in its implications it has never even be fantasized - this astounding renaissance in medical thinking frees human beings from fear of all diseases.

In the simplest terms, physics has been applied to biologic science, offering a theoretical understanding of the rapid and full cures that had already been occurring in practice. Seeing through the endless complexity of diseases and disorders which the old paradigm has generated and still continues to add to, along with an even greater complexity of treatments, physics has yielded a single common denominator true for all disease, cancers, toxins, infections and viruses. Health is based on electron flow. Diseases, toxins, infections, viruses, all deplete that flow. The more serious the disease threat, the greater the depletion. With that common denominator, physics could support the idea of a single effective treatment, and a description of how it cures - anything that can deliver electrons in a sufficiently high enough concentration to where it is needed in the body, can neutralize any disease (any loss of electrons).

Vitamin C, particularly in IV concentrations, had been curing people, and physics allied with biology has now made it clear why. Vitamin C, like other anti-oxidants, provides electrons, but it surpasses all others in its bioavailability to the body.

This insight stands on the shoulders of the work of indigenous and traditional healers going back 1000s of years - Chinese medicine, Ayurvedic medicine, all those who found in nature the means to heal diseases. All have relied on nutrients.

There is one salient difference between nutrients and synthetic drugs of "modern medicine" which stands in stark relief. Nutrients all deliver electrons.

Drugs and vaccines all deplete electrons.

It is almost impossible to convey the import of this gargantuan paradigmatic shift for medicine. The David of medicine - using nature through nutritional supplements - has allied with physics to hit the Goliath of the pharmaceutical industry dead center of it forehead with a single stone - disease is based on loss of electrons and they are making it worse. Everything Goliath does takes away more, adding to disease conditions. Everything David does restores them, and in one case - IV vitamin C - does so in unequalled measure.

The glorious implications for humanity's health run neck and neck with the end of humanity's fear of disease, for first place.

But as remarkable and freeing as this historical juncture for medicine and mankind is, there has been an equally remarkable (and brutal) suppression. While Goliath has been dealt a death blow, he has not yet fallen.

Thoughts of the Catholic Church's using the Inquisition to suppress the truth of Galileo's work, come to mind.

Galileo's support of Copernican astronomy - the sun not the earth is the central body around which planets circulate - conflicted with the Aristotelian view of the universe held by the Catholic Church. Galileo was tried by the Inquisition for heresy. They "delivered their unanimous report: the idea that the Sun is stationary is "foolish and absurd in philosophy, and formally heretical since it explicitly contradicts in many places the sense of Holy Scripture..."; while the Earth's movement "receives the same judgement in philosophy and ... in regard to theological truth it is at least erroneous in faith." ... Galileo was found guilty. The Inquisition sentence came in three parts:

Galileo was found "vehemently suspect of heresy," namely of having held the opinions that the Sun lies motionless at the centre of the universe, that the Earth is not at its centre and moves, and that one may hold and defend an opinion as probable after it has been declared contrary to Holy Scripture. He was required to "abjure, curse, and detest" those opinions.

He was sentenced to formal imprisonment at the pleasure of the Inquisition. On the following day this was commuted to house arrest, which he remained under for the rest of his life.

His offending Dialogue was banned; and in an action not announced at the trial, publication of any of his works was forbidden, including any he might write in the future.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo_affair#Inquisition_examination

To understand the relation between what happened to Galileo and what is occurring now, the focus should be on the tremendous edifice of the Catholic Church at the time. It controlled governments, finances, people's positions, thought, the definition of salvation, and even life and death. From there, it could took it upon itself to "decide" whether the sun or earth was central in the cosmos and to dispense with Galileo who through his telescope saw something that contradicted the Church's doctrine. The Church, then, has the power to "dispense" with reality.

What edifice is there now which has the power to suppress 75 years of facts of astounding cures from a single source, and to continue on with the mind-boggling complexity of diseases and treatments and in the absence of cures? The pharmaceutical industry. Just as with the Catholic Church, has constructed an edifice whose financial power derives from a fixed belief system and the tithes (profit) from such a system. This edifice rests on medical schools, research institutes, foundations, control of government, medical societies, medical conventions, media, medical journals, and corruption so pervasive and endemic, it is now being warned of as a threat to medical science itself. The beginnings of this system included taking control of medical education by wealthy interests invested in the pharmaceutical industry and with a history of extreme power.

"The Commonwealth Fund reports a half a million dollars in one year alone appropriated for this purpose, while the Rockefeller Foundation boasts of over twenty thousand fellowships and scholarships for the training of medical instructors.

"In The Money Givers, Joseph Goulden touches upon this sensitive nerve when he says:

If the foundations chose to speak, their voice would resound with the solid clang of the cash register. ... But the foundations' "innovative money" goes for research, not for the production of doctors who treat human beings. ....

"Dr. David L. Edsall at one time was the Dean of the Harvard Medical School. The conditions he describes at Harvard are the same as those at every other medical school in America:

I was, for a period, a professor of therapeutics and pharmacology, and I knew from experience that students were obliged then by me and by others to learn about an interminable number of drugs, many of which were valueless, many of them useless, some probably, even harmful . . . Almost all subjects must be taken at exactly the same time, and in almost exactly in the same way by all students, and the amount introduced into each course is such that few students have time or energy to explore any subject in a spirit of independent interest. A little comparison shows that there is less intellectual freedom in the medical course than in almost any other form of professional education in this country.

Ideas on treatment that do not redound to the pharmaceutical industry's interests, such natural un-patented treatments that heal, and especially a single un-patented product that can cure disease after disease, assuredly do not. They not only do not receive media attention and do not receive funding for more research into why they heal, but practitioners have faced disparagement, being run of out medicine and even being imprisoned for offering them. Vitamin C offers a shining renaissance in medicine but the edifice of the pharmaceutical industry has maintained a brutal medical dark ages.

"The day when orthodox medicine finally embraces the field of nutrition will be the day when the cartel behind it also has monopolized the vitamin and food product industry essential to it - not one day before."

That day is now.

The FDA, through "food safety" bills S 510 and S 3767, has plans to take control of all food in the US and to end access to supplements, including vitamin C. This fits within a larger international plan called Codex Alimentarius (designed by a pharmaceutical industry CEO who was sent to prison for medical war crimes) to control all food in the world and limit access to adequate nutrition, following the inherent logic of the industry - profit depends on disease, the more disease the more profit, and removal of nutrition would yield endless diseases. Thus nutrition becomes the greatest possible threat to the industry and degrading food and removing access to nutrients becomes essential.

The same FDA has recently imprisoned an herbalist for offering a treatment for skin cancer, threatened cherry growers with closure for any reference to cherries being potentially ten times stronger than non-steroidal anti-inflammatories such as aspirin and ibuprofen, for lowering pain and inflammation, imprisoned a man for selling Rife machines which are associated with harming no one and offer a means of treating disease by using energy), banned ear candles (a traditional means of cleaning the ears of wax), just banned chelation solutions (detoxing from heavy metals) used by parents trying to help their autistic children though there is no history of harm (vitamin C may be covertly included as a chelation solution), and moving beyond its long history of terrifying raids on health practitioners and nutrition companies, has now begun going after natuarl food using armed FBI to attack a small organic food coop, conspiring to close down food buying clubs, raiding Amish farms, .... the list goes on. This same FDA, approves GE-salmon, bans farmers from labeling their food as GMO or not, seeks to ban all labeling of GMOs (including banning organic labeling). And in terms of health, what is occurring there with vaccines may be the most disturbing threat of all, especially given the dark pharmaceutical industry history of intentionally killing with vaccines, and even very recent behavior with them, and given speeches by powerful people connected to the industry, connecting their use to "lowering population."

Things are so scientifically rotten at the FDA that its own scientists sent out a warning letter about corruption there, and had to do so anonymously.

Where the Catholic Church used the fear of hell and its special power to save souls, the FDA, on behalf of the pharmaceutical industry, has come up with its own fear - "food safety" - over which it assigns itself total power to "save" the public. The Catholic Church burned people alive to save their souls. The FDA, in the name of protecting people from unsafe food, seeks power to "preclude the public's right to grow, own, trade, transport, share, feed and eat each and every food that nature makes. It will [have] the most offensive authority against the cultivation, trade and consumption of food and agricultural products of one's choice. It will be unconstitutional and contrary to natural law or, if you like, the will of God."

Those behind "food safety" - the weapon by which they are attempting to remove supplements in the US and which was used to ban all herbal remedies in the EU - are those responsible for 100,000 deaths a year from their drugs, for food contaminated with their products - hormones, antibiotics, pesticides, GMOs, etc., which threaten true food safety and everyone's health. The dissonance between their unsafe food and their manipulative use of the words "food safety" has a totalitarian resonance, not surprising given that those who designed this plan, once used another grotesque and false promotion of "hygiene" - "racial hygiene."

This stunning Galileo moment removes hygiene and diseases themselves from the center of the medical universe. It removes drugs and vaccines, as well, along with "research" seeking cures which the pharmaceutical industry, for financial reasons, could never allow. Instead of illness, the center of the medical universe is now electron flow - the very definition of life - and a single natural substance which abundantly provides it.

In astronomy, Galileo shifted the focus of the cosmos away from man and his planet, to the sun. There is strong parallel to what physics has now done in medicine, altering the focus from infinite disease symptoms to energy itself (electrons).

The Galileo story is telling because the Church's power didn't ultimately triumph over reality. But the world may not want to wait through more years and decades of suppression and the agonizing yet preventable deaths that would mean.

The Catholic Church attempted to put all other thought out of reach. The pharmaceutical industry is attempting, through false science and corruption at every level, to put nature itself off limit to human beings - either by altering it and then claiming to own it through patents, or by subverting governments to get them to apply authoritarian regulations which would prevent people from having access to nature - such as the EU ban on all herbals remedies, and now a plan in Australia to ban 1000s of common plants (many if not most with medicinal properties). and on IV vitamin C here as an unapproved drug. Will the world allow it?

People are at a wonderful moment in history. They know now there is an answer to all diseases, infections, viruses, toxins. There is no longer reason to fear. This puts the pharmaceutical industry's false pandemics and vaccines in a stark light - they are still embedded in a dark ages of manipulated fear and covert power through disease. Galileo's truth triumphed. Medical truth is doing so now.

The giant medical edifice created by the same pharmaceutical industry that ran Auschwitz is quite different from those days. Their research facilities depend on people who are not eugenicists or racists, but are sincerely seeking cures to end suffering. Those researchers face a giant paradigm change but while it may threaten the "industry" which feeds on diseases, for researchers, the change is exciting for the world and for themselves. They will find a means to build on it and to use it to bring the health they have cared so much to provide.

But the pharmaceutical industry itself rests on a house of cards, dependent on endless suppression of good science and on lies through many corrupted channels of communication, to disparage truth. Doctors, researchers, and agencies are now all saying that the pharmaceutical industry has corrupted medicine itself. So, try as they might, the truth has survived their lies, as well as raids, imprisonment, and no funding, and is bursting forth now to offer an end to the very thing the pharmaceutical industry lives by - fear of disease - and to offer the one thing the pharmaceutical industry cannot tolerate without going under - real cures and health for everyone.

That is so immense and so long sought, it is exploding into consciousness now and cannot be crushed. Just as GMOs are being exposed around the world and even the biggest biotech company is failing, the same is about to begin happening to the pharmaceutical industry as its drugs and vaccines are exposed for all depleting electrons. In actually contributing to disease conditions rather than helping them, the drug industry is doomed. And the research scientists pharma has depended on to lend credibility to its vast empire, though they might want to keep being funded, for how long will they care to work on or be associated with research from a collapsing paradigm held up purely by advertising and corruption, when they can become part of the greatest revolution in medical history? After years of watching patients die from terrible diseases, how many doctors will be eager to shift their practices in order to enjoy the relief and incomparable satisfaction of truly saving people's lives?

Galileo would recognize the repression of science that has kept medicine in the terrible condition it is in. Things are so bad that today doctor error and drugs are leading causes of death, not health. And the same industries cause cancer then turn around and profit from it, in what is now called "the Idiot Cycle."

Galileo might also recognize that in physics collapsing all diseases, toxins, infections and viruses down to one basic - loss of electron flow - he would be seeing a familiar, dramatic reorienting of all thinking around a central sun. Immediately, the chaos of unexplained and uncured diseases which has kept increasing, can be put into an orderly configuration. Suddenly, too, in the battle between drugs and vaccines versus nutritional supplements, things become clarified and fall into a visible hierarchy based on electron contribution or depletion. Long disparaged as "worthless" by the pharmaceutical industry which is now having to relabel them as "dangerous" as so many studies of their efficacy flow in, nutrients win hands down. And their much vaunted drugs and vaccines are cast down as irrefutable and even intentional dangers. Galileo might also recognize that physic's re-ordering of the medical cosmos suddenly explains the wondrous cures that vitamin C has been providing for decades.

Would he also appreciate that physic's elegant simplification of medical chaos collapses endless, confused treatments down to a single ideal one, to meet a single definable purpose? What would he say to physic's marriage to biology yielding the greatest gift imaginable to the world - the end of fear of all diseases?

Surely he would wish us all well in working to end the Pharmaceutical Church's Inquisition.
It is not over. The FDA just banned IV vitamin C as an unapproved drug over Christmas.

Drugs and Vaccines Are in Trouble

2010-10-17T11:21:00.003-04:00

by Hugh Reed

There isn't a day that goes by that drugs such as anti-depressants, Fosamax, hormone replacement therapy, Avandia or Vioxx, which was all once strongly touted, are now being questioned for their side effects from psychosis and suicides, to spontaneous bone fractures, to cancers, to heart attacks. to deaths. Even aspirin is now being questioned as a possible cause of deaths as well as the bizarre effects of the 1918 flu. The list of withdrawn drugs is long but it does not include drugs still on the market which are known to harm or kill (of the drugs listed above, only Vioxx has been removed). And prescription aspirin, ibuprofen and other non-steroidal anti-imflammatories routinely kill more than 16,000 people a year.

And vaccines are facing similar issues, with increasing questions about declining safety, inadequate testing, efficacy, increased rate of disease contraction rather than less, ingredients, the associated deaths, the CDC not reporting miscarriages, and US government inaction despite serious adverse events, and even large numbers of deaths which are prompting foreign governments to halt vaccines in their countries. Vaccines are even being looked into as a possible cause of the 1918 flu pandemic.

As plain as it is that both drugs and vaccines present a serious risk to health and life (drugs kill more than 100,000 people a year in the US, the fourth leading cause of death, the collection of bad to frightening news about both has not been enough to fully indict them. There is a sense it is "just" this drug or "just" that vaccine, and a safe and effective one will be out shortly.

But a irrefutable and permanent indictment of both has now arrived.

A great revolution of medical science is in process, sweeping the scattered and great confusion of diseases and their varied treatments into simple order, thanks to physics. Rather than look at diseases as distinct entities needing distinct treatments, physics looked instead at what divides health, disease, or death, and it is electron flow. Health is based on a strong electron flow. Diseases, toxins, viruses, and infections have one thing in common, they deplete electrons - the more serious the disorder, the greater the loss of electrons. Death can be measured by no flow of electrons.

Orthodox medicine' with its panoply of drugs and vaccines disparages vitamins and minerals (nutrients) as treatments for disease, treating them either as worthless or dangerous, despite the millennia of their use by other cultures and despite university studies now showing their efficacy. But this on-going argument is now over. Physics has declared drugs and vaccines as the losers, for a simple reason: they both deplete electrons from the body, the very definition of a disease state. On the other hand, nutrients all add to electron flow, the definition of health.

The monumental paradigm shift that is now occurring in medicine - reducing all diseases, toxins, infections and viruses down to one central issue - electron loss, has accomplished what the older medical paradigm has failed at. Despite billions for research and studies, despite billions more on products, the older paradigm is swimming in disordered complexity and has failed to find cures for diseases.

The new paradigm has already reconfigured the considerable chaos of diseases and medical treatments and brought them into intelligible order. In the process, the tangle of treatments can be unscrambled as well. Because as physics disencumbers medicine from the idea that diseases, toxins, infections and viruses harm in different ways, and offers instead a single common pathway by which they all cause harm, it also dissipates confusion about treatment approaches. It reveals an inescapable division between what is required for health (adding enough electrons to neutralize loss) and what harms (depleting more electrons).

Vaccines and drugs have been failing individually for years (see above). Now, they all fail in common, based on physics. They deplete electron flow. If someone were ill, defined quite clearly now as "loosing electrons," the use of any drugs or vaccines would contribute to greater loss. For doctors or patients, the medical decision becomes plain - drugs and vaccine would be important to avoid, because they subtract from the very process required to get well, increasing electron flow.

S 510 and Cancer

2010-10-07T19:11:00.012-04:00

by Jeremy Lasko

Intravenous vitamin C's impact on a man in NZ is stunning and wonderful news and it is being heard around the world. The behavior of the hospitals and medical establishment, on the other hand, is causing outrage.

60 Minutes in NZ reported on Intravenous Vitamin C Curing a New Zealander's Swine Flu Just As Life Support Was to be Terminated.

And in 2006, NIH confirmed vitamin C's efficacy in treating cancer, something Linus Pauling attempted to share with the world decades ago, for which he was attacked, rather than lionized.

Intravenously administered vitamin C as cancer therapy: three cases.

"We found 3 well-documented cases of advanced cancers, confirmed by histopathologic review, where patients had unexpectedly long survival times after receiving high-dose intravenous vitamin C therapy. We examined clinical details of each case in accordance with National Cancer Institute (NCI) Best Case Series guidelines. Tumour pathology was verified by pathologists at the NCI who were unaware of diagnosis or treatment. In light of recent clinical pharmacokinetic findings and in vitro evidence of anti-tumour mechanisms,these case reports indicate that the role of high-dose intravenous vitamin C therapy in cancer treatment should be reassessed." [Emphasis added.]

Yet S 510 and S 3767, "food safety" bills in the US and C-36, a "product safety" bill in Canada, would remove access to it and to all supplements in adequate enough doses to treat disease.

Even prior to the "food safety" bills, the FDA has been working for years to remove information on the scientific value of supplements, even very recently threatening health stores and websites that they may not even mention the word "flu" or "H1N1" in advising customers about what products could be helpful.

And the AMA has arranged medical coding so doctors could not use supplements as therapies for diseases, no matter how confirmed in studies, without potentially facing prison.

[Go you can go to ANH-USA.org for updates on the bills and any new ones that may be inserted to remove nutritional supplements.]

Why has the government been mute about this cheap, gentle, effective treatment for cancers? Why is it trying to get rid of a superior treatment for cancer?

How does it work?

All diseases, infections, toxins and viruses cause illness by depleting electron flow. Dr. Thomas Levy (videos below) says vitamin C adds to electron flow and if it can reach the toxin, infection, or the pro-oxidant disease process in high enough concentration, by adding electrons and neutralize any toxic or disease condition. Though other nutrients can add to flow, vitamin C is the ideal choice for this because it is extremely uniquely bioavailable.

Thomas E. Levy, MD, JD, is a cardiologist and lawyer.

Levy spoke in NZ on 9/17/2010 on Vitamin C: The Facts, the Fiction, and the Law. For a much larger amount of information, including many original articles, his powerpoint lecture on vitamin C and the law can be found here.

Dr. Thomas E. Levy discusses, on this video page, how he became interested in vitamin C, and the positive effect it can have. The videos also include one on "iron fortified cereal," which should not be missed as it shows what the drug companies and food industry consider "supplementation."

Background

Yet another cardiologist, Matthias Rath (renowned for his work on vitamin C), offers background on why supplements are being attacked and who developed a plan to remove an adequate amount of nutrition from human access. "...In Europe ... (in 1943, it [was]) A crime punishable by death to spread information in regard to nutrition in Norway, Belgium, Holland, and all other conquered countries."

Dr. Robert Verkerk describes the plan (called CODEX ALIMENTARIUS) on video.

In another short video, Verkerk explains that people are living in extreme fear of diseases - which IV vitamin C could end - and through fear, CODEX plans open the door to yet more antibiotics and to irradiation of all food, despite it destroying vitamins and enzymes in food and in cats, to death and strange neurologic reactions.

Perhaps unaware that S 510 and S 3767 would remove access to it and to adequate levels of every kind of nutritional supplement, national media has begun doing segments on IV vitamin C, recognized now as an increasingly relied upon cancer therapy,

IV vitamin C as a cancer therapy

CBC News http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ycT6mI3SAi4&feature=related

Interviews with patients http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KSp4VS2wY70&feature=related

Dr. Rowan http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i-7XsMS4wEA&feature=related

ABC News http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MCBRMFBVzi0&feature=related

Fox News http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T__IF8JlxLI

Channel 6 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jbdjQEOH3DE&feature=related

The Real Story http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dR38y2I5g5E&feature=related

yupfarming

A Global Corporate Youth Brigade: Using Social Networks for Evil

Playing the HAARP Nicely

What Is Wrong With the CDC?

Bob Williams for Salem-News.com

The U.S. Public Health Service (USPHS) and Malaria (1914-1942)

Wisconsin's Honey and Vandana Shiva's Law for Food Fascism ...

Farming: Why Obama's government is George Wallace, Monsanto is the KKK, and we are all black children now

Monsanto and the Big Fat Lie of Food Safety

Vaccines as cluster bombs

Corporations have redefined food as "stuff"

OUR LAND - COLLATERAL FOR THE NATIONAL DEBT

A National Response to Two FDA Armed Raids on Rawesome

Monsanto’s FDA Goes After the Country’s Only Safe Milk

Posted on August 5, 2011

Murdoch and Vaccines: Exposure of Crimes Reveals a Much Larger Story

The Monsanto Anschluss: Long Laid Plans to Undo the Rule of Law

Posted on August 7, 2011

Ralph Nader and the flaming Pinto vaccines

Leaked trade agreements and hidden things inside S 510: Corporations plan to end normal farming

Protecting the good things in life by stopping S 510

The Dawn of A New Age in Medicine: Physics Offers A Unified Field Theory of All Disease

Drugs and Vaccines Are in Trouble

S 510 and Cancer

Intravenously administered vitamin C as cancer therapy: three cases.